Posts tagged P2

Ron Paul Supporter Likes The Way Paul Tells It Like It Has No Chance Of Being.
RICHMOND, IN—Self-proclaimed strict constitutionalist and freethinker  Rick Crawford told reporters Monday he is supporting Ron Paul in the  2012 Republican presidential primaries because of the way the candidate  looks people directly in the eye, doesn’t mince words, and tells it like  it will never, ever be in a million years. “Ron cuts right through the  fat and doesn’t sugarcoat anything when he talks about policies that  would be absolutely impossible to implement, like abolishing the federal  income tax, eliminating Medicare, or putting the nation’s currency back  on the gold standard,” Crawford said as he pounded a hand-painted “Ron  Paul 2012” sign in his front lawn. “He’s not afraid to give Americans  no-nonsense straight talk about his completely delusional fantasy world.  That’s why I’m part of the highly unlikely Ron Paul revolution.”  Sources close to Crawford’s family said his wife supports Mitt Romney  because of the way he tells it like people want to hear it.
http://www.theonion.com/articles/ron-paul-supporter-likes-the-way-paul-tells-it-lik,27138/
~ I don’t think Paultards will get it, which makes this article even better. BAAHAAHA!

Ron Paul Supporter Likes The Way Paul Tells It Like It Has No Chance Of Being.

RICHMOND, IN—Self-proclaimed strict constitutionalist and freethinker Rick Crawford told reporters Monday he is supporting Ron Paul in the 2012 Republican presidential primaries because of the way the candidate looks people directly in the eye, doesn’t mince words, and tells it like it will never, ever be in a million years. “Ron cuts right through the fat and doesn’t sugarcoat anything when he talks about policies that would be absolutely impossible to implement, like abolishing the federal income tax, eliminating Medicare, or putting the nation’s currency back on the gold standard,” Crawford said as he pounded a hand-painted “Ron Paul 2012” sign in his front lawn. “He’s not afraid to give Americans no-nonsense straight talk about his completely delusional fantasy world. That’s why I’m part of the highly unlikely Ron Paul revolution.” Sources close to Crawford’s family said his wife supports Mitt Romney because of the way he tells it like people want to hear it.

http://www.theonion.com/articles/ron-paul-supporter-likes-the-way-paul-tells-it-lik,27138/

~ I don’t think Paultards will get it, which makes this article even better. BAAHAAHA!

11 notes

"Ron Paul Did Not Vote for MLK Day"- TheRoot.com
"In a blog entry at Atlantic magazine, Ta-Nehisi Coates examines GOP presidential contender Ron Paul’s House  voting record and determines that he did not cast a vote in favor of MLK  Day. Coates conducted the research after a rumor erupted on Twitter  during the GOP debates in New Hampshire on Saturday that Paul voted in  favor of the legislation.
… But first here’s Ron Paul on Martin Luther King Day in his newsletters:
"Boy, it sure burns me to have a national holiday for Martin  Luther King. I voted against this outrage time and time again as a  Congressman. What an infamy that Ronald Reagan approved it! We can thank  him for our annual Hate Whitey Day."
… Paul’s supporters link to his Yea vote on this 1979 bill as evidence that he supported an MLK Holiday:
"TO AMEND H.R. 5461, MARTIN LUTHER KING HOLIDAY, BY DESIGNATING  THE THIRD MONDAY IN JANUARY RATHER THAN JANUARY 15 AS THE LEGAL  HOLIDAY." 
But this actually isn’t the bill for the holiday. The text  doesn’t even claim that. More importantly, the date is wrong. This vote  was taken on December 5, 1979. The vote for the King holiday was actually taken on November 13, 1979:
The bill was called up in the House on Tuesday, November 13, 1979  … When the final vote was taken, 252 Members voted for the bill and  133 against — five votes short of the two-thirds needed for passage.
I’m sorry to report that one of those Nay votes, as you can see here, was cast by one Ronald Paul. I’m sorry to further report that Paul again voted no on the 1983 bill that passed.” via- http://www.theroot.com/buzz/ron-paul-did-not-vote-mlk-day?wpisrc=root_more_news
So who exactly is govtrack.us?
According to the webiste, it was launched in 2004 by Joshua Tauberer as a hobby. It enables it’s users to track the bills and votes of members of U.S Congress, allowing the users to check voting records and attendance relative to peers. http://www.govtrack.us/about.xpd
-Here’s the thing.
GovTrack is not an official government website nor is it affiliated with government or the library of congress.
GovTrack is paid though advertising.
GovTrack misrepresents itself as being the absolute source for voting records and information, which it is not.
GovTrack does not report 100% accurate information regarding Ron Paul and are inconsistent with the actual records of the Library of Congress, news reports and newspaper articles relating to these specific times/events.
Anyone can look up these records via the Library of Congress, which posts all these records online already. http://www.loc.gov/index.html
There is no reason to use a third party to get the information.
"I’m a civic hacker, which means finding creative technological solutions to real world problems." - Joshua Tauber
Tauber is also a longtime Ron Paul supporter and campaign donor. GovTrack is now a company that is run by many people who do in fact post correct information tracking actual votes, but not all of their information is truthful or consistent with actual findings. Why? You’ll have to ask the "civil hacker"/Ron Paul fan who owns the company for that answer.
There’s a difference between civil hacking and criminal hacking but Paultards just don’t get it. Much like Ron Paul, they too have a nasty reputation. They seem to have a habit of lying, and using botnet http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botnet to spam the web with fake support, statistics & fake information about their cult leader, Ron Paul Manson. As with any other cult member, a Paultard will go to great lengths in effort to defend/excuse King Ron Paultard, often times crossing the line in desperation.
Some Examples Of Paulbot Hacking & Spamming:
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/no-doubt-nicole-scherzinger-twitter-accounts-hacked-20120111 
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=076_1194268772 
http://www.dailypaul.com/63052/someone-hacked-bill-oreillies-website 
http://www.cnbc.com/id/21257762/An_Open_Letter_to_the_Ron_Paul_Faithful
http://www.kansascurmudgeon.com/?p=85
So when it comes to honest records about Ron Paul, govtrack.us is not the answer. You’ll notice when Paultards try to disprove negative facts about his crappy record, they’ll direct you to a post on govtrack.us as "proof" but if you go straight to the source, you’ll see it’s a lie. http://www.loc.gov/index.html
Another good resource is http://www.votesmart.org/about/history for honest tracking of voting records, attendance, and evaluations.

"Ron Paul Did Not Vote for MLK Day"- TheRoot.com

"In a blog entry at Atlantic magazine, Ta-Nehisi Coates examines GOP presidential contender Ron Paul’s House voting record and determines that he did not cast a vote in favor of MLK Day. Coates conducted the research after a rumor erupted on Twitter during the GOP debates in New Hampshire on Saturday that Paul voted in favor of the legislation.

… But first here’s Ron Paul on Martin Luther King Day in his newsletters:

"Boy, it sure burns me to have a national holiday for Martin Luther King. I voted against this outrage time and time again as a Congressman. What an infamy that Ronald Reagan approved it! We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day."

… Paul’s supporters link to his Yea vote on this 1979 bill as evidence that he supported an MLK Holiday:

"TO AMEND H.R. 5461, MARTIN LUTHER KING HOLIDAY, BY DESIGNATING THE THIRD MONDAY IN JANUARY RATHER THAN JANUARY 15 AS THE LEGAL HOLIDAY."

But this actually isn’t the bill for the holiday. The text doesn’t even claim that. More importantly, the date is wrong. This vote was taken on December 5, 1979. The vote for the King holiday was actually taken on November 13, 1979:

The bill was called up in the House on Tuesday, November 13, 1979 … When the final vote was taken, 252 Members voted for the bill and 133 against — five votes short of the two-thirds needed for passage.

I’m sorry to report that one of those Nay votes, as you can see here, was cast by one Ronald Paul. I’m sorry to further report that Paul again voted no on the 1983 bill that passed.” via- http://www.theroot.com/buzz/ron-paul-did-not-vote-mlk-day?wpisrc=root_more_news

So who exactly is govtrack.us?

According to the webiste, it was launched in 2004 by Joshua Tauberer as a hobby. It enables it’s users to track the bills and votes of members of U.S Congress, allowing the users to check voting records and attendance relative to peers. http://www.govtrack.us/about.xpd

-Here’s the thing.

  • GovTrack is not an official government website nor is it affiliated with government or the library of congress.
  • GovTrack is paid though advertising.
  • GovTrack misrepresents itself as being the absolute source for voting records and information, which it is not.
  • GovTrack does not report 100% accurate information regarding Ron Paul and are inconsistent with the actual records of the Library of Congress, news reports and newspaper articles relating to these specific times/events.
  • Anyone can look up these records via the Library of Congress, which posts all these records online already. http://www.loc.gov/index.html
  • There is no reason to use a third party to get the information.

"I’m a civic hacker, which means finding creative technological solutions to real world problems." - Joshua Tauber

Tauber is also a longtime Ron Paul supporter and campaign donor. GovTrack is now a company that is run by many people who do in fact post correct information tracking actual votes, but not all of their information is truthful or consistent with actual findings. Why? You’ll have to ask the "civil hacker"/Ron Paul fan who owns the company for that answer.

There’s a difference between civil hacking and criminal hacking but Paultards just don’t get it. Much like Ron Paul, they too have a nasty reputation. They seem to have a habit of lying, and using botnet http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botnet to spam the web with fake support, statistics & fake information about their cult leader, Ron Paul Manson. As with any other cult member, a Paultard will go to great lengths in effort to defend/excuse King Ron Paultard, often times crossing the line in desperation.

Some Examples Of Paulbot Hacking & Spamming:

So when it comes to honest records about Ron Paul, govtrack.us is not the answer. You’ll notice when Paultards try to disprove negative facts about his crappy record, they’ll direct you to a post on govtrack.us as "proof" but if you go straight to the source, you’ll see it’s a lie. http://www.loc.gov/index.html

Another good resource is http://www.votesmart.org/about/history for honest tracking of voting records, attendance, and evaluations.

30 notes

 
Who is Ron Paul?

Ask the good folks at stormfront.org about Ron Paul
Ask The Knights of the Klu Klux Klan about Ron Paul
Ask the NSM about Ron Paul
Ask the American Nazi Party about Ron Paul
Ask David Duke about Ron Paul
Ask Jamie Kelso about Ron Paul
Ask Randy Gray about Ron Paul
Ask the Konch Brothers about Ron Paul
Ask The John Birch Society about Ron Paul
Ask The “Family Research” Counsel about Ron Paul
Ask Don Black about Ron Paul
Ask The Robert A. Taft Club about Ron Paul
Ask Jared Taylor about Ron Paul
Ask James Edwards about Ron Paul
Ask Kevin De-Ana about Ron Paul
BASICALLY ask anyone who is affiliated with hate crimes, has racist views, hates Jews & the LGBTQ community and voilà!
I guarantee they will have all the information you need about what a swell guy Ron Paul is.

You know why?..

"STFU YOU NEO-CON WAR MONGER! YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT ANYTHING! YOU SHOULD KILL YOURSELF! HOW DARE YOU TELL THE TRUTH AB.. i mean.. HOW DARE YOU INSULT RON PAUL CHRIST!! RON PAUL IS OUR ONLY HOPE FOR A WHITE AMER.. i mean..”

I know exactly what you mean Paultards.. Let me know when you are finished eating a dick.

*KISSES!!*

Who is Ron Paul?

Ask the good folks at stormfront.org about Ron Paul
Ask The Knights of the Klu Klux Klan about Ron Paul
Ask the NSM about Ron Paul
Ask the American Nazi Party about Ron Paul
Ask David Duke about Ron Paul
Ask Jamie Kelso about Ron Paul
Ask Randy Gray about Ron Paul
Ask the Konch Brothers about Ron Paul
Ask The John Birch Society about Ron Paul
Ask The “Family Research” Counsel about Ron Paul
Ask Don Black about Ron Paul
Ask The Robert A. Taft Club about Ron Paul
Ask Jared Taylor about Ron Paul
Ask James Edwards about Ron Paul
Ask Kevin De-Ana about Ron Paul
BASICALLY ask anyone who is affiliated with hate crimes, has racist views, hates Jews & the LGBTQ community and voilà!
I guarantee they will have all the information you need about what a swell guy Ron Paul is.
You know why?..
"STFU YOU NEO-CON WAR MONGER! YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT ANYTHING! YOU SHOULD KILL YOURSELF! HOW DARE YOU TELL THE TRUTH AB.. i mean.. HOW DARE YOU INSULT RON PAUL CHRIST!! RON PAUL IS OUR ONLY HOPE FOR A WHITE AMER.. i mean..”
I know exactly what you mean Paultards.. Let me know when you are finished eating a dick.
*KISSES!!*

11 notes

Guys- Seriously- Ron Paul wasn’t involved with those newsletters even a little bit! 

"I also put out a political type of business investment newsletter, and sort of covered all these areas. And it covered a lot about what was going on in Washington and financial events. Especially some of the monetary events."

http://ronpaulnewsletters.blogspot.com/

http://ronpaulexposed.wordpress.com/

15 notes

I just can’t figure out why anyone would think Ron Paul wrote those racist, bigoted newsletters..
So what if they were published from his home and who cares if they ran for 30 years! At least he made a shit load of money, and NO I don’t care that he profited from racism! HE CAN’T EVEN BE RACIST BECAUSE I QUOTE GANDHI! AND!..AND! ..um FREEDOM!! AND LIBERTY! AND.. oh ya- AND RACISM IS A COLLECTIVISM or somethin.. um.. RON PAUL IS OUR ONLY HOPE YOU FUCKING NEO-CON! FACIEST! SOCIALIST! MARXIST! ..
NO-I-DONT-KNOW what any of those words actually mean, but .. YOU ARE SO IGNORANT!!!
I KNOW THEY SOUND GOOD AND THATS WHAT THEY TAOUGHT ME IN PAULTARD SKOOL!
U R so lamestream.. like 4realz!
RON PAUL’s NOT hiding behind anything! Maybe a few things but.. WHO CARES!
420 420 420 420! He can be as racist as he wants to be as long as the state I live in passes the..wait. Ron Paul WILL STILL LEGALIZE IT BECAUSE I HAVE INVESTED MY FUCKING LIFE INTO HIM SO IM RIGHT AND U R WRONG AND RON PAUL IS MOTHER TERESA PLUS JESUS AND CUPCAKES WITH SPRINKLES OF THE FINEST CRONIC IN TOWN. ..if my state actually passes it BUT THEY WILL BECAUSE EVERY REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRAT IN CHARGE OF STATES LOVE LOVE LOVES DR RONALD PAUL! AND THEY WILL OBEY 2 HIS DICTATORSH..i mean RULES!! HIS RULES U LOOzEr!
U R SO INGORENT!
-wake up. xox

I just can’t figure out why anyone would think Ron Paul wrote those racist, bigoted newsletters..

So what if they were published from his home and who cares if they ran for 30 years! At least he made a shit load of money, and NO I don’t care that he profited from racism! HE CAN’T EVEN BE RACIST BECAUSE I QUOTE GANDHI! AND!..AND! ..um FREEDOM!! AND LIBERTY! AND.. oh ya- AND RACISM IS A COLLECTIVISM or somethin.. um.. RON PAUL IS OUR ONLY HOPE YOU FUCKING NEO-CON! FACIEST! SOCIALIST! MARXIST! ..

NO-I-DONT-KNOW what any of those words actually mean, but .. YOU ARE SO IGNORANT!!!

I KNOW THEY SOUND GOOD AND THATS WHAT THEY TAOUGHT ME IN PAULTARD SKOOL!

U R so lamestream.. like 4realz!

RON PAUL’s NOT hiding behind anything! Maybe a few things but.. WHO CARES!

420 420 420 420! He can be as racist as he wants to be as long as the state I live in passes the..wait. Ron Paul WILL STILL LEGALIZE IT BECAUSE I HAVE INVESTED MY FUCKING LIFE INTO HIM SO IM RIGHT AND U R WRONG AND RON PAUL IS MOTHER TERESA PLUS JESUS AND CUPCAKES WITH SPRINKLES OF THE FINEST CRONIC IN TOWN. ..if my state actually passes it BUT THEY WILL BECAUSE EVERY REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRAT IN CHARGE OF STATES LOVE LOVE LOVES DR RONALD PAUL! AND THEY WILL OBEY 2 HIS DICTATORSH..i mean RULES!! HIS RULES U LOOzEr!

U R SO INGORENT!

-wake up. xox

20 notes

Paultards are constantly complaining about “lamestream” media ignoring their Lord & Savior: Ronald Paul Tard. Well!.. They definitely are now! Congratulations?

Moral of the story: Be careful what you wish for.

:)

22 notes

Don’t Believe the Ron Paul Hype

The Texas congressman might win Iowa—but that’s about it.

—By Tim Murphy

Ron Paul 
Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas)

If at any point during the past three decades you had suggested that Ron Paul might win a major Republican nominating contest, you’d probably get a response resembling the face the Texas congressman makes when he’s outlining the case for legalizing the sale of raw milk: two parts incredulity, one part mild amusement, a dash of electric shock.

And yet, with the Iowa caucuses one month out, the odds have never been better for the septuagenarian libertarian icon. The Washington Post's Chris Cillizza, a good barometer of DC wisdom, suggested on Wednesday that Paul might even be a serious contender for the nomination if he would just “hedge his foreign policy views.” By which he means: Cut back on the isolationism and whisper more sweet nothings about Israel. (Paul’s already taken steps toward the latter.)

Paul might just win Iowa. As Red State founder Erick Erickson points out, he’s worked the state harder than almost anyone else and honed his message to appeal to corn belt conservatives (the raw milk line is a winner). But that doesn’t make him a serious contender. As Politico’s Maggie Haberman and others have pointed out, Paul’s candidacy has a clear ceiling. Until his opponents start talking about the following issues, you’ll know Paul isn’t a serious threat:

The newsletters: Since 1978, Paul published and sold a newsletter (known alternatively as Ron Paul’s Political Report, Ron Paul’s Survival Report, and Ron Paul’s Freedom Report) to tens of thousands of libertarians scattered across the country. Especially in the beginning, it played into the concerns of a certain kind of conservative white guy. As the New Republic reported, the newsletters suggest Paul is “not the plain-speaking antiwar activist his supporters believe they are backing—but rather a member in good standing of some of the oldest and ugliest traditions in American politics.” Some excerpts:

Continue: 

http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/12/dont-believe-ron-paul-hype

11 notes